MARAPONE
AI Document Assessment — Construction
CLIENT: Northside GC Group
PROJECT: K-12 Build, Ph 2
PREPARED: Sample — your date here
REF: ASMT-SAMPLE-001
// Documents reviewed
38
Drawing sheets (A / S / M)
61
Open RFIs
2
Spec divisions (23, 26)
// Executive summary
An automated pass cross-referenced all 61 open RFIs against the 38 supplied drawing sheets and the mechanical and electrical specs. The model surfaced 9 items worth a human look: 2 high-severity coordination conflicts, 4 medium-severity scope or answer gaps, and 3 low-severity housekeeping items. Two of the high-severity items sit on the critical path for the mechanical rough-in.
Each finding below cites the specific drawing sheet and RFI number so your team can verify it in minutes. This is a screening pass, not a substitute for the project team's judgment — every flag is meant to be confirmed by a person.
// Findings
F-01 · Mechanical / structural clash at gridline
HighDuct routing on M-401 passes through a beam web shown on S-210 with no penetration detail. RFI #0042 asks about ceiling heights in the same zone but doesn't reference the conflict. Likely a coordination miss.
Cited: M-401, S-210, RFI #0042 · Suggested action: route to structural before next mechanical pull.
F-02 · Critical-path RFI unanswered 19 days
HighRFI #0051 (electrical panel location) is unanswered and gates the rough-in start per the supplied look-ahead. It is not flagged as critical in the RFI log.
Cited: RFI #0051, E-301 · Suggested action: escalate; tie to schedule activity.
F-03 · Two RFIs ask the same question
MediumRFI #0033 and #0047 both ask for the same door hardware clarification on A-602. One was answered; the other is still open, risking a contradictory response.
Cited: RFI #0033, #0047, A-602 · Suggested action: close #0047 as duplicate.
F-04 · Spec / drawing mismatch on fixture
MediumLighting schedule on E-601 calls a fixture type that doesn't appear in spec 26 51 00. Either a substitution wasn't logged or the schedule is stale.
Cited: E-601, Spec 26 51 00 · Suggested action: confirm fixture with EE.
+ 5 additional findings (F-05 … F-09) in the full sample. Redacted here for length.
// What this means for you
A reviewer working these 61 RFIs against 38 sheets by hand is a full day or more, and the cross-document conflicts (F-01, F-04) are exactly the kind a tired human misses at 5pm. The pass that produced this report took the model under ten minutes. The free assessment shows you that on your own documents — no build commitment, no data leaving an environment you approve.
// Method & handling
- ✓ Every flag cites a source document and location so your team verifies, not trusts.
- ✓ Run on an isolated environment; documents are deleted after the assessment unless you ask us to keep them.
- ✓ No third-party LLM API calls. Nothing is added to any training set.
- ✓ A screening aid for your team — it does not replace professional review or sign-off.